{"id":20881,"date":"2026-02-22T15:27:02","date_gmt":"2026-02-22T11:57:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/mashreghnews_en\/07007713317390968714\/"},"modified":"2026-02-22T15:27:02","modified_gmt":"2026-02-22T11:57:02","slug":"07007713317390968714","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/mashreghnews_en\/07007713317390968714\/","title":{"rendered":"From Trump&#8217;s Green Light to Tel Aviv&#8217;s Constraints: Why Israeli Analysts Fear Renewed Conflict with Iran"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following the recent Trump-Netanyahu meeting, interpreted as a green light from Washington to the Israeli Prime Minister, a serious question has arisen in political circles within the occupied territories and the West: Can Israel once again consider extensive, unchallenged operations against Iran?<\/p>\n<p>Recent analyses by Israeli experts increasingly indicate a shifting equation. They emphasize that Iran has learned from past experiences, concealed its weaknesses, and enhanced its offensive and defensive capabilities to the point where the cost of any attack has reached unprecedented levels. The loss of the element of surprise, limited defensive stockpiles, the expansion of Iran&#8217;s missile capabilities, and its constant readiness are among the factors highlighted in numerous reports by Israeli and Western analysts.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, Hebrew media references to the twelve-day war and the heavy losses\u2014many of which are still censored by the Israeli military\u2014warn that the repercussions of Iranian missile attacks could be far more catastrophic than previous conflicts. Consequently, Israeli analysts present factors distinguishing any potential future war from the twelve-day conflict, which will be explored in this report.The quantitative and qualitative enhancement of ballistic missiles, addressing vulnerabilities, and identifying weaknesses are critical components of the analysis. Experts from Israeli research institutions, such as the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) and the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies (BESA), assert that Iran has not only increased its stockpile of ballistic missiles but has also improved their accuracy, range, and destructive power.<\/p>\n<p>Israeli claims based on intelligence reports suggest that Iran now possesses the largest missile arsenal in the Middle East and the world, featuring missiles with various ranges\u2014from short-range missiles like Fateh-110 to medium-range missiles like Shahab-3 and Emad.<\/p>\n<p>In a confidential session within the Knesset&#8217;s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, an Israeli military representative stated that Iran has swiftly resumed ballistic missile production. This session revealed that about six months after the twelve-day war, missile production in Iran has restarted at a high pace. It was estimated that in the next conflict, Iran could launch between 500 and 1,000 missiles simultaneously at Israel.The ability to fire 500 missiles in a single wave of attacks would present a significant challenge to Israel&#8217;s detection and interception systems. Even with a high interception rate of over 90% by systems like Iron Dome, this would mean at least 50 to 100 missiles could reach strategic targets.<\/p>\n<p>Israeli experts believe that Iran has meticulously analyzed the details of Israel&#8217;s operations during the twelve-day war, identifying and largely rectifying its weaknesses. It became evident that simultaneous launches of multiple missiles could pressure Israel&#8217;s defense systems and reduce their interception capacity.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, according to military and weapons experts, Iran was able to identify gaps in the performance of Israel&#8217;s defense systems during the twelve-day war. Despite launching a limited number of missiles toward various areas of occupied Palestine, Iran successfully hit designated targets, indicating that Israeli defense systems struggled to intercept these missile attacks.Iran has adopted a &#8216;Silo Organization&#8217; strategy, meaning it has dispersed various types of weapons across multiple protected locations to minimize the risk of losing its entire missile capability in a preemptive strike.<\/p>\n<p>This arsenal now includes stationary and mobile ballistic missiles, ground and sea-based cruise missiles, advanced reconnaissance and attack drones (such as Shahed-136), and recently, hypersonic missiles.<\/p>\n<p>This diversification compels Israel to activate multiple layers of defense (against ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones) simultaneously, which is logistically and financially burdensome. The recent conflict demonstrated that this approach did not yield favorable results for the Israeli regime.The Iron Dome system was designed for short-term conflicts with limited threat volumes (such as conflicts with Hamas or Hezbollah). Each Iron Dome battery has a limited number of Tamir interceptors. Other defense systems, including David&#8217;s Sling and Arrow 1 and 2, not only failed to effectively counter Iranian missiles but also imposed significant financial burdens on Israelis, as each interceptor costs between $1 to $2 million.<\/p>\n<p>In a large-scale Iranian attack that could last for days or weeks, these stockpiles would be rapidly depleted, and the process of producing and replenishing these missiles is time-consuming and costly. Manufacturing each missile used by these systems takes weeks, indicating that during wartime, there is no possibility for rapid production and replacement. Even with potential U.S. support, the challenge of quickly transferring these munitions in wartime represents a serious vulnerability for the Israeli regime.Moreover, the military industries of the Israeli regime (such as Rafael and Israel Aerospace Industries) face significant limitations in supporting warfare production and maintenance. Sudden increases in production during wartime are hindered by global supply chain constraints, the need for specific raw materials, and skilled labor, presenting considerable obstacles.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, complex systems like defense networks require regular maintenance. Under conditions of war and continuous attacks, maintaining the full operational capability of these systems becomes exceedingly difficult. Damage to even one or two batteries can create a dangerous gap in the regime&#8217;s defensive shield.<\/p>\n<p>It is also noteworthy that a significant portion of the regime&#8217;s military production occurs in the United States, which, coupled with production timelines, complicates the transportation of these systems.Following the twelve-day war and the Israeli regime&#8217;s aggression against Iran, which resulted in the deaths of thousands of civilians and military personnel, Iran has reached a heightened state of readiness. Its extensive intelligence network in the region (through proxy forces and allies) allows for rapid monitoring of any significant military movements by the Israeli regime.<\/p>\n<p>Israeli security officials have admitted that Iran is meticulously tracking developments within the occupied territories and monitoring all activities. This means that any potential Israeli attack would face an immediate response, making it impossible to replicate the element of surprise experienced in the previous conflict, namely the initial strikes on various regions and the assassination of military officials.Geographically, Israel (the occupied territories) is a small area with densely packed vital centers (Tel Aviv, occupied Jerusalem, the Dimona nuclear facility, and the ports of Haifa and Ashdod). In a full-scale war, Iran could simultaneously attack through its allies in Lebanon (where Hezbollah reportedly maintains tens of thousands of missiles and drones), Iraq, and Yemen, bombarding the Israeli regime from multiple fronts.<\/p>\n<p>This multi-front assault would force Israel&#8217;s defense systems to divide their resources, preventing them from focusing solely on the Iranian missile threat. Such a &#8216;multi-front war&#8217; poses a strategic nightmare for the Israeli military.<\/p>\n<p>As previously stated by the leader of the revolution, Iran will respond directly to any aggression from the Israeli regime and does not need to rely on other members of the resistance axis or launch attacks from elsewhere to defend itself.Warnings from Israeli experts serve as a wake-up call for decision-makers in Tel Aviv indicating that the consequences of miscalculations could exceed their expectations leading to more painful and irreparable blows in any potential conflict ahead.<\/p>\n<p>While Trump&#8217;s support is politically significant it cannot alleviate the inherent operational and military limitations of Israel. The scenario of an attack on Iran is now more intertwined than ever with the risks of a protracted multi-front war destruction of vital infrastructure and severe human and economic losses.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore while Israel may keep military options on the table it will likely need to calculate far more carefully and may resort to alternative methods (such as inciting internal unrest cyber warfare sabotage operations or encouraging the U.S. to apply maximum economic pressure) alongside its plans for renewed aggression against Iran.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The recent meeting between Trump and Netanyahu has ignited crucial discussions within Israeli security circles regarding the potential risks of a full-scale conflict with Iran. Can Tel Aviv afford to engage in another extensive military operation against Tehran?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":581,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[64],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20881","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-palestine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20881","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/581"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20881"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20881\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20881"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20881"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ghodsnama.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}